Racial Labeling In State Legislation
Tracy Garnar, Sione Lynn Pili Lister, and I used South Carolina state legislation from 1850-1920 to understand how changes in the division of labor, and changes in the distribution of power, shaped racial labeling practices over time. The article, “Putting a Label on It: Racial Labels in South Carolina State Laws from 1850 to 1920,” is published online at Sociology of Race and Ethnicity (free pre-print version here). We build on the old sociological idea that social classification practices, in this case racial labels, are rooted in the organization of people into a division of labor (DOL).
Contradicting old Durkheimian theories, we find that racial labeling became more prevalent as South Carolina’s DOL advanced, but they adapted to use more abstract, general racial labels. This allowed power holders to adjust classification processes strategically as ideas about who did what in society changed. For instance, racist legislation shifted from distinguishing rights and responsibilities assigned to specific groups and toward language that enshrined different rights and responsibilities to “the races.” We also show how these labeling practices differed during the Reconstruction Era, when reformers pursued race-neutral legislation, and during periods of escalating threats to the interest of white elites, when distinctions among “whites” and all others escalated.




